The Barter of Data — How Consumers weigh this exchange
In our modern world, a silent barter takes place every day — the exchange of data between consumers and businesses. Behind the scenes lies a fascinating journey that has transformed the way we connect, communicate, and navigate in our lives. As we look at these complexities of exchange more closely, we uncover a tale of digital evolution where the interplay of technology, consumer behavior, and data privacy concerns has shaped the perception of value at the heart of this barter.
What forces have shaped the assessment of value for consumers and businesses over the years? How has this exchange evolved, and what gets that to the equilibrium between experiences and concerns? And finally, what can we learn as businesses to make this handshake work?
In this article, we look to find clues to these questions through an exploration of the past, present, and future of this exchange between consumers and corporations.
The evolution of exchange.
We must first look back to the 1990’s — an era of burgeoning internet connectivity. Consumers eagerly embraced the nascent internet and its potential to revolutionize how they interacted with businesses. Take, for instance, Amazon, one of the pioneers of online retail. In its early days, consumers willingly shared their names and email addresses to create accounts on the platform. In return, Amazon gave personalized product recommendations using its initial model for the collaborative filtering algorithm, the first step of which was to search across users to find people with similar interests (such as similar purchase patterns), and then look at what items have those similar users found, that you haven’t yet. This simple exchange of basic information laid the groundwork for a new era of data-driven commerce.
In the early 2000s, the internet matured, and consumer’s expectations grew alongside it. Google introduced a new era of personalized experiences through services likes Gmail and Google Search. By analyzing user behavior and search patterns, these platforms delivered content and advertisements. Consumer now not only shared information willingly but also expected businesses to anticipate their needs, offering a taste of the customization they craved.
And then, towards the mid-2000s, came the social media giants like Facebook and Twitter. These platforms encouraged users to voluntarily contribute massive amounts of personal data, from preferences and relationships to life-events and interests. In return, users enjoyed the social connectivity and the thrill of sharing their lives online. The exchange had evolved into a two-way street where consumers actively generated data, which businesses leveraged to refine their offerings further.
That is, until the data privacy awakening of the next decade. Late 2000s marked a turning point. One of the first most high-profile data breaches occurred in 2005 when ChoicePoint, a data aggregation company, experienced a significant breach. This breach exposed the personal information, including Social Security numbers, of approximately 163,000 individuals. While it may not be the first-ever data breach, it certainly succeeded in bringing the issue of data breaches to public awareness. What followed in the subsequent years of the decade was a series of data breaches — the hacking of Heartland Payment Systems (2008), customer data leak of over a million TJX company customers (2008), data breach at Hannaford Brothers (2008), at PlayStation Network (2011), at Epsilon (2011), and so on. These incidents served as a wake-up call for both consumers and businesses. The data breaches not only highlight the importance of data security and privacy, but also played a pivotal role in prompting regulatory changes such as GDPR and CPPA to protect consumer’s personal information.
Despite growing privacy concerns, several factors contributed to consumers’ willingness to continue sharing their data. Amazon, Netflix, Spotify, and others led the way in offering seamless experiences. Amazon’s recommendation engine continued to sharpen to a point of remarkable accuracy, often suggesting products consumers were genuinely interested in purchasing. Netflix’s content recommendations algorithm ensured viewers were presented with content tailored to their viewing history. Facebook starting providing users with personalized news feed, displaying content from friends and pages they interacted with the most. Users willingly shared personal information, knowing that it enhanced their social interactions and content discovery. Companies also played their part in enhancing transparency (just a little) and obtaining informed consent from users. Later towards the decade, some companies diversified their offerings to provide value-added services beyond their core products. For instance, fitness apps not only tracked users’ exercise routines but also provided personalized health recommendations based on user data. Such services added tangible value to consumers’ lives, making data sharing a more acceptable trade-off.
The evolution of value.
Over the course of this evolution of exchange, the concept of value assessment has undergone a transformation. During the initial stages of this exchange, consumers viewed value through the prism of personalized experiences and enhanced convenience. Amazon, Netflix, and others championed this narrative and consumers willingly shared their data, recognizing that it paved the way for better suggestions and seamless service experiences.
Consumers, now accustomed to convenience, began to expect more substantial returns for sharing their information. In response, the value proposition broadened to encompass an array of tangible benefits that enriched consumers’ lives. Case in point, being the fitness apps. Alongside these developments, transparency and responsible data handling assumed pivotal roles in the value proposition. Consumers, increasingly aware of privacy concerns, sought reassurances from companies regarding their practices. Clear and accessible privacy policies, coupled with informed consent mechanisms, became essential components of exchange.
But identifying the intersection between personal data domains the consumers are more willing to share is nuanced. It involves a deeper understanding of the delicate balance between value, trust, and privacy. There are, however, some clear patterns to discern consumer sentiments with data. Many consumers are willing to share health and fitness data with trusted entities, especially if it leads to personalized wellness recommendations, fitness plans, or even remote health monitoring. Sharing data with healthcare providers, fitness apps, and wearable tech companies is increasingly common. Consumers also willing share data related to their entertainment preferences, such as movie and music preferences, will streaming platforms. Location data, when shared for navigation and travel purposes, generally seems to be well accepted. Consumers today share their location with map apps, ride-sharing services, and travel booking platforms for convenience and safety. There are seems to be continued willingness to share shopping data, including purchase history and preferences, with ecommerce platforms. In return, they expect tailored recommendations but also exclusive deals.
The same, however, cannot be said about the sentiment to share data related to other personal domains such as financial and banking data, social and relationships data — particularly with 3rd party apps, biometric and genetic data, and more such domains.
So, how can companies achieve the exchange-value equilibrium?
Let’s approach this from a scientific and analytical perspective. In psychology and consumer behavior, the concept of “trust transfer” is well established. It suggests that consumers are more likely to trust an unknown entity when it is associated with a trusted brand. For a startup in the health tech space seeking private consumer data, partnering with an established healthcare provider, a respected research institution, or a reputable health tech brand can leverage this trust transfer effect. Consumers may be more willing to share data with the startup when it is aligned with a trusted partner.
Behavioral economic principles come into play when consuming data-sharing behaviors. Consumers often weight the perceived benefits (incentives) against potential risks (privacy concerns). Taking a cue, designing scenarios where consumers receive tangible incentives, such as personalized health insights, early access to cutting-edge health solutions, or cost savings in exchange for their data. Behavioral economics shows us that well-structured, purposeful incentives can motive data sharing.
The Privacy-Calculus model posits that individuals make decisions about sharing personal information based on an intuitive cost-benefit analysis. Imagine you are using a fitness app from a startup. They want you to share personal data like age, weight, and exercise habits. You might think, “What if they share my data with others without my permission? That’s a risk”. On the other hand, the app promises to give you customized workout plans and healthy eating tips based on your data. That’s a benefit. The Privacy-Calculus Model says that if the benefits (like getting fit) outweigh the costs (like data privacy concerns), you are more likely to share your data.
Companies can also do a few things on their end to ensure consumers are more willing to share that data. They should make it abundantly clear what they would do the consumer data and how they will protect it. Regulation and certifications also help establishing that trust. Companies should also let the consumers decide what data to share and allow them to change their mind later. In economics, information asymmetry refers to situations where one party has more or better information than others. This theory is like a see-saw in a playground. In this case, it’s about companies knowing more about consumer data versus what consumers know how they would use it. Say, you are at a car dealership, looking to buy a used car. The seller, who knows everything about the car condition, is like the “one party” with more information. The buyer has less information because they can’t see inside the engine, access sellers experience with the car, or check the car’s history like the seller can. Therefore, its imperative companies explain to its consumers in simple terms how they handle data, keep it safe, and use it to provide better services.
In the context of data sharing, established platforms often benefit from network effects. Let’s say you have a new social media app, like a party you’re hosting. At first, you invite a few friends (users) to join. They come and start posting pictures and messages. Now, when more people see your app and how much fun your friends are having, they want to join the party too. Similarly, when it comes to data sharing, people often feel more comfortable sharing with companies that already have lots of users. Why? Because most tend to believe in crowd intelligence. But also because they expect more benefits.
It is clear that, when handled ethically and transparently, data becomes the fertile soil in which innovation and trust flourish. The exchange of data is no longer just about data; it is increasingly about genuinely enriching the lives of individuals. It’s about a future where consumers willingly and enthusiastically embrace data sharing, knowing that they are not just giving away information, but partaking in a grand tapestry of innovation, progress, and shared values.
(All views expressed are solely of the author)
Subscribe to DDIntel Here.
DDIntel captures the more notable pieces from our main site and our popular DDI Medium publication. Check us out for more insightful work from our community.
Register on AItoolverse (alpha) to get 50 DDINs
Support DDI AI Art Series: https://heartq.net/collections/ddi-ai-art-series
Join our network here: https://datadriveninvestor.com/collaborate
